THE NEW REPUBLIC
PART I — A NATION FINDS ITS FOOTING
From the Constitution on Paper to a Government in Practice
1789–1800
The Revolution Was Over. The Experiment Was Not.
Imagine the United States in the spring of 1789.
The country has won its independence from Britain.
The Treaty of Paris has formally ended the Revolutionary War.
The Articles of Confederation have revealed serious weaknesses in the nation's first system of government.
And after years of disagreement and compromise, a new Constitution has been ratified.
On paper, the United States now possesses a framework for a stronger national government.
But a framework is not the same as a functioning country.
The federal government has no established executive departments.
Its new courts have yet to begin operating.
Its financial system is unsettled.
The nation owes money to foreign lenders and domestic creditors.
The states disagree about economic policy.
European powers still influence trade and territory in North America.
And Indigenous nations continue defending their sovereignty and homelands against expanding American settlement.
Even the office of president is largely untested.
No one has ever served as president under this Constitution.
No one knows exactly how the office will function in practice.
The people who wrote the Constitution understood that they had created something ambitious.
But they could not know whether it would endure.
The United States had declared its independence. Now it had to prove that it could govern itself.
George Washington — The First President
On April 30, 1789, George Washington stood on the balcony of Federal Hall in New York City.
He took the oath of office as the first president of the United States under the Constitution.
Washington was already among the most recognizable figures in America.
He had commanded the Continental Army through the Revolutionary War.
He had presided over the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia.
And he had earned widespread public confidence through his military service and willingness to relinquish command after the war.
But the presidency was something entirely new.
There was no previous American president under the Constitution whose decisions he could follow.
No established presidential cabinet.
No long-standing executive traditions.
And no settled understanding of how a president should conduct himself.
Even seemingly simple questions required consideration.
How should the president be addressed?
How formal should public ceremonies become?
How frequently should he consult Congress?
What authority should he exercise independently?
Washington understood that his decisions could become precedents for future presidents.
He sought to establish an executive office that possessed sufficient dignity and authority without resembling the monarchy Americans had rejected.
The challenge was not simply to lead.
It was to help define an institution that would outlast him.
Building a Government Almost From Scratch
The Constitution established three branches of the federal government.
But it left Congress and the president responsible for creating many of the institutions needed to make those branches work.
The First Congress began meeting in New York in March 1789, although it initially lacked the quorum needed to conduct business.
Once organized, lawmakers confronted an extraordinary agenda.
They needed to establish a system of federal revenue.
They needed executive departments.
They needed courts.
They needed rules governing public administration.
And they needed to determine how the federal government would exercise its constitutional responsibilities.
During Washington's first year, Congress established the Departments of Foreign Affairs, later renamed State, Treasury, and War.
The position of attorney general was also created.
These offices would become the foundation of the executive branch's administrative structure.
Thomas Jefferson became secretary of state.
Alexander Hamilton became secretary of the treasury.
Henry Knox became secretary of war.
Edmund Randolph became attorney general.
Washington consulted these officials on important matters.
Over time, the practice helped establish what became known as the presidential cabinet.
The Constitution did not explicitly create a cabinet in its modern form.
It developed through the practical needs of governing.
This was an important characteristic of the early republic.
Some of America's governing traditions were written into the Constitution. Others emerged because the new government needed a way to function.
The Judiciary Act of 1789
The Constitution created a Supreme Court and authorized Congress to establish lower federal courts.
But it did not provide a complete judicial system.
Congress had to build one.
The Judiciary Act of 1789 established a structure of federal district and circuit courts and organized the Supreme Court.
John Jay became the first chief justice.
The new judiciary would help resolve disputes involving federal law and other matters within federal jurisdiction.
But questions remained about the relationship between state courts and federal courts.
How much authority should the national judiciary possess?
When could federal courts review actions taken by other branches?
How would the courts interpret the Constitution when disputes arose?
Those questions would become central to American government.
The courts were not merely another set of buildings and officials.
They were part of an attempt to establish a government in which legal disputes could be addressed through institutions rather than settled entirely by political power.
The system would continue developing long after Washington's presidency.
The Bill of Rights — Protecting Individual Liberties
Ratification of the Constitution had not ended disagreements about federal power.
During the ratification debates, critics warned that the new government might become too powerful.
Many wanted explicit protections for individual rights.
Supporters of the Constitution offered different arguments.
Some believed the Constitution already limited federal authority sufficiently.
Others agreed that amendments could provide additional safeguards and public reassurance.
James Madison became an important figure in developing proposed amendments.
Congress submitted twelve amendments to the states in 1789.
Ten were ratified by December 1791.
They became known as the Bill of Rights.
These amendments protected freedoms involving religion, speech, the press, assembly, and petition.
They also addressed matters such as criminal procedure, searches and seizures, and the relationship between federal authority and powers not delegated to the national government.
The Bill of Rights represented another stage in the effort to define the limits of government.
But the protections did not immediately produce equal freedom for everyone.
Slavery continued.
Women remained excluded from most formal political participation.
Indigenous nations faced mounting pressure on their lands.
And voting qualifications differed substantially among the states.
The constitutional language of liberty would become part of a much longer national debate over who possessed rights and how those rights should be protected.
A Nation Burdened by Debt
One of the greatest challenges facing the new government was financial.
The Revolutionary War had been expensive.
The national government owed substantial sums to foreign lenders and domestic creditors.
Individual states also carried debts associated with the war.
Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress had struggled to raise sufficient revenue because it depended heavily on state contributions.
The Constitution gave the new federal government the authority to levy taxes and regulate commerce.
But possessing those powers did not automatically create a stable financial system.
The United States needed a way to collect revenue, repay creditors, establish public credit, and support its operations.
Alexander Hamilton, the first secretary of the treasury, believed these issues were closely connected.
He argued that a reliable financial system would strengthen the nation's economic prospects and political stability.
His proposals would become some of the most consequential—and controversial—policies of the early republic.
Alexander Hamilton's Financial Program
Hamilton proposed that the federal government fund its existing debt and assume certain outstanding Revolutionary War debts owed by the states.
He believed that honoring public obligations would establish confidence in the new government.
A government capable of paying its debts, he argued, would be better positioned to borrow money when necessary and support economic development.
But not everyone agreed with his approach.
Some states had already repaid much of their wartime debt.
Their representatives questioned whether they should help assume the remaining obligations of other states.
Other critics worried that Hamilton's program would favor financial interests and concentrate economic power in the federal government.
There were also disputes about government securities.
Some original holders had sold their claims to investors at reduced prices.
Paying the full value of those securities raised questions about who would benefit from the federal government's repayment policy.
Hamilton's supporters emphasized contractual obligations and national credit.
His opponents raised concerns about fairness, state interests, and the distribution of financial benefits.
The debate revealed that creating a national economy involved difficult political choices.
The Compromise of 1790
The disagreement over state debts became connected to another major question.
Where should the permanent national capital be located?
Different regions favored different locations.
Northern and southern political leaders had competing interests.
A political accommodation emerged in 1790.
Congress approved federal assumption of eligible state Revolutionary War debts.
It also passed the Residence Act, establishing a permanent federal district along the Potomac River.
Philadelphia would serve as the temporary national capital while the new federal city was prepared.
The compromise reflected the realities of governing a country whose states did not always share the same priorities.
It also demonstrated how financial decisions and political geography could become intertwined.
The selection of the capital would eventually lead to the construction of the Capitol and the President's House.
Those buildings would become enduring symbols of the federal government.
But in 1790, they were still plans for a city that had yet to be built.
The First Bank of the United States
Hamilton also proposed a national bank.
He believed a bank could help the federal government manage funds, support public credit, and improve financial operations.
Congress approved legislation establishing the First Bank of the United States in 1791.
But the proposal produced a major constitutional disagreement.
Thomas Jefferson and James Madison questioned whether Congress possessed the authority to establish such an institution.
The Constitution did not expressly grant Congress the power to create a bank.
Hamilton argued that the bank was a constitutional means of carrying out powers expressly assigned to the federal government.
His reasoning relied in part on the Necessary and Proper Clause.
Jefferson favored a more restrictive interpretation of federal authority.
Washington considered the competing arguments before signing the bank legislation.
The disagreement would become a lasting feature of American constitutional debate.
How broadly should the federal government's enumerated powers be interpreted?
The Constitution established the framework.
But its application would require continuing interpretation and disagreement.
Hamilton and Jefferson — Different Visions of the Republic
Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson both served in Washington's administration.
Both had supported American independence.
Both participated in the political life of the founding generation.
And both believed the new republic needed to survive.
But they disagreed about how the country should develop.
Hamilton favored a stronger national financial system and policies that could encourage commerce, manufacturing, and public credit.
Jefferson placed greater emphasis on agricultural independence, limited federal authority, and the preservation of state and local political power.
These differences extended beyond economic policy.
They reflected competing concerns about the future of republican government.
Hamilton feared that weak national institutions could undermine the country's stability.
Jefferson feared that excessive centralization could threaten liberty.
Neither man's political philosophy can be reduced to a single modern political label.
Their disagreements developed in the circumstances of the 1790s, when the boundaries of federal authority were still being established.
Washington tried to manage these divisions within his administration.
But the differences would become increasingly difficult to contain.
The country was beginning to discover that political disagreement would not disappear simply because Americans had adopted a common Constitution.
The Whiskey Rebellion — 1794
The federal government's authority soon faced a practical test.
In 1791, Congress enacted an excise tax on distilled spirits.
The tax was part of Hamilton's revenue program.
But it was deeply unpopular in some western communities.
Whiskey had economic importance for many frontier farmers.
Distilling grain could make agricultural products easier to transport and sell.
Some farmers viewed the tax as burdensome and unfair.
Others objected to the federal government's methods of collection and enforcement.
Resistance became especially intense in western Pennsylvania.
By 1794, protests had escalated into threats, attacks on tax officials, and armed resistance.
Washington's administration regarded the situation as a serious challenge to federal law.
The president called out militia forces to suppress the uprising.
Washington briefly accompanied the mobilized troops before turning command over to others.
The organized resistance collapsed without a major battle between the militia force and the insurgents.
The Whiskey Rebellion demonstrated that the new federal government could mobilize substantial resources to enforce its laws.
But it also raised questions about taxation, protest, regional interests, and the proper use of federal power.
Supporters of the administration considered the response necessary to uphold constitutional government.
Critics worried about the scale of the military response and the treatment of political opposition.
The young republic was confronting a problem familiar to governments throughout history.
How can a government enforce the law while preserving the liberties of the people it governs?
The Western Frontier — A Conflict Over Land and Sovereignty
While federal institutions were developing in eastern cities, another struggle was unfolding in the Ohio Country.
The United States claimed territory west of the Appalachian Mountains under the settlement that ended the Revolutionary War.
But Indigenous nations had not surrendered their sovereignty simply because Britain recognized American independence.
Native communities continued occupying, governing, and defending their homelands.
A confederation of Indigenous nations resisted American expansion in the Northwest Territory.
The conflict involved nations including the Shawnee, Miami, Delaware, and others, though individual communities and leaders held differing positions.
American military expeditions suffered major defeats.
In 1791, a United States force under Arthur St. Clair was defeated by Indigenous warriors in one of the most severe losses in the history of the U.S. Army.
The federal government subsequently reorganized its military efforts.
General Anthony Wayne led the Legion of the United States against the confederated forces.
In 1794, American forces won the Battle of Fallen Timbers.
The following year, the Treaty of Greenville was signed.
It established a boundary and involved extensive Indigenous land cessions in present-day Ohio and surrounding areas.
But the treaty did not end Indigenous resistance to American expansion.
Nor did it resolve the underlying conflict over land and sovereignty.
The development of the new republic therefore involved more than the establishment of government institutions.
It also involved territorial expansion and the displacement of Indigenous peoples.
The principles of liberty and self-government were being asserted by a nation whose expansion threatened the political independence of other nations already living on the continent.
A Revolution in France — And a Dilemma for America
Events overseas soon created another challenge.
In 1789, the French Revolution began.
France had been a crucial American ally during the Revolutionary War.
French military and financial assistance had helped the colonies secure independence.
But revolutionary events in France developed into a much larger European conflict.
In 1793, Britain and France were at war.
The United States faced a difficult question.
Should it support France because of the alliance established during the American Revolution?
Or should it avoid becoming involved in another European war?
Washington's administration announced a policy of neutrality in 1793.
The decision reflected the country's limited military and financial resources.
The United States was still building its institutions.
Its economy depended heavily on overseas commerce.
Another major war could threaten the republic's survival.
But neutrality was controversial.
Some Americans sympathized strongly with revolutionary France.
Others were alarmed by political violence in France and feared the spread of instability.
The debate intensified existing divisions among American political leaders.
Foreign policy was becoming another source of domestic political conflict.
The Citizen Genêt Affair
In 1793, Edmond-Charles Genêt arrived in the United States as a representative of revolutionary France.
He sought American support for France's war effort.
His activities included efforts to encourage military operations and privateering that conflicted with Washington's neutrality policy.
The administration objected.
The dispute became known as the Citizen Genêt Affair.
The controversy raised questions about foreign influence, executive authority, and the obligations of a neutral nation.
It also demonstrated how deeply events in Europe could affect American politics.
The United States had won its independence from one European empire with the assistance of another.
Now it was trying to establish a foreign policy based on its own national interests.
Maintaining that independence would require more than military victory.
It would require diplomatic judgment.
Jay's Treaty — A Difficult Agreement With Britain
Relations with Britain remained strained after the Revolutionary War.
British troops continued occupying certain frontier posts.
Disputes persisted over trade, debts, and British interference with American shipping.
In 1794, Washington sent Chief Justice John Jay to negotiate with Britain.
The resulting agreement, known as Jay's Treaty, was signed in 1794 and ratified in 1795.
It addressed several outstanding disputes and provided for British withdrawal from frontier posts in American territory.
Supporters believed the treaty helped avoid another war with Britain and protected American commercial interests.
Opponents argued that it conceded too much and failed to resolve important grievances, including British impressment of sailors.
The controversy produced intense political debate.
Public meetings, newspapers, and political organizations became increasingly involved.
The treaty demonstrated how foreign policy could sharpen domestic divisions.
It also showed that the new republic's diplomatic independence did not mean it possessed equal power with the European empires.
American leaders often had to choose among imperfect options.
Pinckney's Treaty — Opening the Mississippi
Relations with Spain were also important.
Spain controlled Louisiana and the port of New Orleans.
For settlers and merchants in the western United States, access to the Mississippi River was economically significant.
Agricultural products could be transported downriver toward the Gulf of Mexico.
In 1795, the United States and Spain concluded an agreement commonly known as Pinckney's Treaty.
The treaty established the southern boundary between the United States and Spanish Florida and secured important navigation and deposit rights connected to the Mississippi River and New Orleans.
The agreement helped improve conditions for western commerce.
It also demonstrated the importance of diplomacy to the growing American economy.
The United States was still a relatively young and vulnerable country.
But it was gradually establishing relationships that would shape its future expansion.
The Rise of Organized Political Opposition
During the 1790s, disagreements among political leaders became more organized.
Supporters of Hamilton's financial program and Washington's administration increasingly became associated with the Federalists.
Opponents of many Federalist policies, including Jefferson and Madison, helped organize what became known as the Democratic-Republican movement.
These were not the same political parties that dominate American elections today.
The modern Democratic Party emerged through later political developments.
The modern Republican Party was founded in the 1850s.
The parties of the 1790s arose from the specific disputes of the early republic.
They disagreed about constitutional interpretation, financial policy, foreign relations, and the balance between federal and state authority.
Many Founders had expressed concerns about factionalism.
Yet political organization emerged as Americans tried to influence elections and government decisions.
Newspapers became increasingly partisan.
Political leaders coordinated supporters.
Voters were presented with competing interpretations of the country's future.
The constitutional system was beginning to operate in ways that its designers had not fully anticipated.
Washington Chooses to Leave Office
By 1796, Washington had served nearly eight years as president.
He had guided the new government through its first major institutional, financial, military, and diplomatic challenges.
But he decided not to seek another term.
The Constitution at that time did not impose the modern two-term limit.
Washington's decision therefore established an influential precedent.
In September 1796, his Farewell Address was published.
It discussed national unity, political divisions, public credit, foreign relations, and the dangers Washington believed could threaten the republic.
His warnings about political parties reflected his concern that intense factional loyalty might undermine the public interest.
His discussion of foreign relations emphasized the importance of independent judgment and caution regarding permanent political entanglements.
Washington did not eliminate political divisions.
Nor did he resolve every question facing the country.
But his departure helped establish that presidential authority could be relinquished through an orderly constitutional process.
The new republic was preparing for another test.
Could the presidency pass peacefully to someone else?
John Adams Becomes President
The election of 1796 produced a new president.
John Adams, associated with the Federalists, defeated Thomas Jefferson under the electoral system then in place.
Jefferson became vice president.
The arrangement reflected the original constitutional method for selecting the president and vice president.
It also placed political rivals in the nation's two highest executive offices.
On March 4, 1797, Adams became the second president of the United States.
Washington's departure and Adams's inauguration marked the first transfer of presidential authority under the Constitution.
The transfer was peaceful.
But the new administration inherited serious political divisions.
Foreign relations were deteriorating.
The Federalists and Democratic-Republicans were increasingly organized.
And arguments over the limits of federal power were intensifying.
The first presidency had ended.
The constitutional experiment continued.
The XYZ Affair and the Quasi-War
Relations between the United States and France deteriorated during Adams's presidency.
French forces interfered with American shipping.
American diplomats attempted to negotiate a settlement.
The resulting controversy became known as the XYZ Affair.
Reports of demands made by intermediaries connected to French officials produced outrage in the United States.
Tensions escalated.
From 1798 to 1800, the United States and France fought an undeclared naval conflict commonly called the Quasi-War.
American naval forces engaged French vessels, particularly in the Caribbean and Atlantic.
The conflict tested the country's developing military and diplomatic capabilities.
It also intensified domestic political divisions.
Federalists generally supported stronger defensive measures.
Their opponents worried about the possibility of a broader war and the expansion of federal power.
Adams ultimately pursued renewed negotiations.
The Convention of 1800 helped end the conflict.
The episode demonstrated how easily international tensions could become domestic political controversies.
The Alien and Sedition Acts — 1798
In 1798, the Federalist-controlled Congress passed four laws collectively known as the Alien and Sedition Acts.
The legislation included measures affecting naturalization, the treatment of foreign nationals, and certain forms of political expression.
The Sedition Act made particular categories of false, scandalous, and malicious writing against the federal government or specified federal officials punishable under federal law.
Supporters defended the legislation as necessary for national security during a period of foreign tension.
Opponents argued that it threatened freedom of expression and political opposition.
Several newspaper editors and political critics faced prosecution.
The controversy raised serious constitutional questions.
What protections did the First Amendment provide?
Could the federal government punish political criticism?
How should national security concerns be balanced against civil liberties?
The debate was particularly significant because the Bill of Rights had been ratified only a few years earlier.
The republic was already confronting disputes over the meaning of its constitutional protections.
The Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions
Opposition to the Alien and Sedition Acts produced another constitutional confrontation.
In 1798, Kentucky and Virginia adopted resolutions criticizing the federal legislation.
Thomas Jefferson drafted the Kentucky Resolutions, while James Madison drafted the Virginia Resolutions.
The resolutions challenged the constitutionality of the acts and advanced arguments concerning the relationship between the federal government and the states.
The two sets of resolutions were not identical in their language or implications.
They nevertheless reflected a broader disagreement over how constitutional limits should be enforced.
Federalists generally defended the authority of the national government to enact the measures.
Opponents argued that the legislation exceeded constitutional boundaries.
The controversy would influence later debates about federalism, state authority, and constitutional interpretation.
It also demonstrated that the Constitution had not ended disagreements about the distribution of political power.
It had created a framework within which those disagreements would continue.
The Election of 1800
By 1800, political divisions had become deeply entrenched.
John Adams sought reelection.
Thomas Jefferson emerged as the principal opposition candidate.
The campaign involved bitter newspaper attacks, disputes over foreign policy, and competing interpretations of the federal government's proper role.
The original Electoral College system produced an unexpected complication.
Jefferson and his running mate, Aaron Burr, received equal numbers of electoral votes.
Under the Constitution's original procedure, the election moved to the House of Representatives.
After repeated ballots, the House selected Jefferson as president in February 1801.
The episode exposed weaknesses in the original electoral system.
It helped lead to the Twelfth Amendment, ratified in 1804, which established separate electoral votes for president and vice president.
But the election of 1800 became significant for another reason.
The presidency passed from one organized political faction to another through constitutional procedures.
The transition was contentious.
It was not free from uncertainty.
But it occurred without a successful attempt by the outgoing administration to retain power outside the constitutional process.
The young republic had passed an important institutional test.
WHAT THE FIRST DECADE REVEALED
The years between 1789 and 1800 demonstrated both the possibilities and the difficulties of the new constitutional system.
The federal government had established executive departments, courts, revenue mechanisms, and financial institutions.
The Bill of Rights had been ratified.
The presidency had developed early governing traditions.
The national government had enforced federal law against armed resistance.
The United States had navigated difficult relationships with Britain, France, and Spain.
Political parties had emerged despite widespread concerns about factionalism.
And the country had experienced its first major disputes over constitutional rights and the boundaries of federal power.
But serious problems remained.
Slavery continued.
Indigenous nations faced expanding American settlement and military pressure.
Women and many other Americans remained excluded from equal political participation.
Regional economic interests differed.
And disagreements about the Constitution's meaning had become a permanent feature of national politics.
The republic had survived its first decade under the Constitution.
That survival did not mean its future was secure.
THE FOUNDERS DID NOT AGREE ON EVERYTHING
One of the most important lessons of the early republic is that the founding generation did not possess a single, unified political philosophy.
Washington, Hamilton, Jefferson, Madison, Adams, and their contemporaries shared important experiences and concerns.
But they disagreed about how the new government should operate.
Some placed greater emphasis on national authority.
Others emphasized limits on federal power.
Some supported policies intended to strengthen commercial and financial institutions.
Others worried that those policies could create concentrations of economic influence.
Some favored closer relations with Britain.
Others sympathized more strongly with revolutionary France.
These disagreements were not incidental to the founding.
They were part of the political process through which the new republic developed.
The Constitution provided institutions for governing.
It did not eliminate differences in political judgment.
The American experiment required people with competing visions to operate within a shared constitutional framework.
A NATION STILL FINDING ITS WAY
By the beginning of 1801, the United States had changed substantially from the country that inaugurated George Washington in 1789.
The government had functioning institutions.
The federal financial system was more established.
The Supreme Court and lower federal courts were operating.
The country had developed a national political conversation shaped by newspapers, elections, and organized opposition.
But the future remained uncertain.
Britain and France continued competing for influence in the Atlantic world.
American merchants depended on overseas trade.
Settlers continued moving westward.
Indigenous nations resisted territorial encroachment.
And the question of how much authority the federal government should exercise remained unsettled.
Thomas Jefferson was preparing to assume the presidency.
His administration would confront new opportunities and new controversies.
A vast territory west of the Mississippi would soon become the subject of an extraordinary diplomatic agreement.
American expansion would accelerate.
International trade disputes would intensify.
And the United States would eventually find itself at war with Britain once again.
The new republic had found its footing.
But it had only begun to discover what its independence would require.
THE STORY CONTINUES
NEXT — PART II: THE REPUBLIC EXPANDS
Thomas Jefferson, the Louisiana Purchase, and a Changing America (1801–1809)
The first decade under the Constitution established the institutions of the new federal government.
The next decade would test them in different ways.
Thomas Jefferson would take office after a bitterly contested election.
The United States would acquire the Louisiana territory from France.
Meriwether Lewis and William Clark would lead an expedition across lands inhabited and governed by Indigenous nations.
American commerce would face growing interference from European powers.
And disputes over trade and national sovereignty would move the country toward another confrontation with Britain.
The next chapter follows a republic that had learned how to govern itself—and was now beginning to expand across a continent.
Our Money Matters.
Our Choices Matter.
Our Voice Matters.
The People. The Voice. The Future.
Politics 1776